***Proposed Freeway Routes***

Within the last year the Gila River Indian Community (GRIC) Transportation  Technical Team (TTT) has conducted community outreach meetings for feedback to aid in the process of consideration of the proposed South Mountain Loop 202 freeway on Community lands approximately 1,000-­4,000 feet from the  Community boundary at Pecos Road. However in this process, the TTT has presented only two Loop 202 alignment options:

1)  the E1 Alignment—the off reservation or Pecos Road alignment; and

2) the GRIC  alignment—the “optional” on-­reservation alignment. The current on-reservation study is in conjunction with GRIC, the Arizona Department of Transportation  (ADOT), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Maricopa Association of  Governments (MAG) and the city of Phoenix.

The  E1  Alternative  or  Pecos  Alignment: The E1  Alternative or Pecos Alignment,  was  finalized in 2005 by ADOT. It is a corridor  approximately 1000 feet wide and is  about 37 miles long. From the intersection with I-­10 and the Santan portion of the Loop  202, the proposed Pecos Alignment/E1 Alternative follows Pecos Road, turning to avoid  the GRIC and cutting through South Mountain. The alignment then turns north near  59th Avenue to intersect with  I-­10  (Fig.  1).

Figure 1

GRIC  Alignment: In  2000 by resolution, District 6 Community members voted down the consideration of a  freeway on tribal land. Later in  2005, a GRIC-­wide resolution  reinforced the previous  decision. The people had spoken clearly: the South Mountain Freeway was not wanted on  tribal lands.

Yet in January 2010 Governor Bill  Rhodes sent a letter to Governor Brewer and ADOT  to  reopen the issue.  The letter outlined concerns of the Community,  including avoiding cultural  sites, preserving traditional routes and wildlife corridors, and not cutting into South Mountain.  This study option was identified as consisted with the Gila Borderlands Regional  Planning Study conducted for the GRIC in 1988.

The On-­Reservation alignment proposed by GRIC leadership in 2010 is touted as an “alternative” to address community members concerns about  the cultural and environmental impact of the Pecos Alignment.

The proposed GRIC alignment runs from Pecos Park on 48th Street southward, turning east west-­ ward, paralleling  Pecos  Road. It extends toward a District 6 subdivision to avoid  cutting into South  Mountain. There is less than 1 mile between the Pecos and GRIC Alignment’s (see  Fig.  1).

While the people declare that a freeway is not wanted on tribal land, tribal leadership continues to do what it thinks is best. But when looked at closer, the preservation of  South  Mountain by way of the proposed GRIC route is not much different from the Pecos Alignment. Impacts are NOT mitigated by a distance of less than 1 mile. Looked at another  way, it becomes clearer that South Mountain preservation is only a front to bolster leadership’s real concern: economic development.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s